|
|
Cost/Effectiveness Modeling
Key Benefits:
-
Ties costs to operationally relevant
metrics to assess value
-
Bridges cost models to operational
models through common assumptions about capabilities and
configurations
-
Forces disciplined discussion and
coordination between cost analysts and engineers
Capabilities:
-
System Architecture Trade
Studies
-
Analysis of Alternatives
-
Cost Analysis Requirements
Descriptions (CARD)
-
Technical Description
Documents (TDD)
-
System and Operational Architectures
Clients:
-
Office of the Deputy
Assistant Secretary of the Army for Cost and Economics (ODASA-CE):
Developed an Integrated Performance and Cost Model (IPCM)
environment for comprehensive cost/benefit analyses.
-
Navy:
Developed a prototype Decision Support System to facilitate
capability-based costing,
evaluated cost reduction initiatives for the F/A-18E/F and V-22 as well
as affordability initiatives for the Joint Strike Force program
-
USAF's Air
Combat Command and AC2ISRC:
Conducted
cost/benefit analysis of the U-2, Global Hawk, DarkStar and
Common Ground Station for the Global Hawk Analysis of
Alternatives (AoA)
-
USAF:
Studied payload and system architecture options for the
Multi-mission Command and Control Aircraft - as the
replacement for JSTARS, AWACS, and Rivet Joint airframes
-
NRO/USAF/DARPA:
Participated
in development of the Operational System Concept for the
Discoverer II program
-
OASD(C3I)
(formerly Defense Airborne Reconnaissance Office (DARO)):
evaluated
cost/benefit of alternative System of Systems for manned,
unmanned, and satellite collection systems and associated
processing / exploitation / dissemination (PEDs) to support
tradeoff analyses
|
|